"The gods had condemned Sisyphus to ceaselessly rolling a rock to the top of a mountain, whence the stone would fall back of its own weight. They had thought with some reason that there is no more dreadful punishment than futile and hopeless labor." "The Myth of Sisyphus" by Albert Camus.
NEVER BEEN ONE FOR POLITICAL GAMES
Like the average American I don’t get involved much with politics, but I try hard to stay abreast of what our leaders in
On the other hand, like many Farmington Woods residents I spent the
first thirteen years of my time here paying little or no
attention to what was going on politically with our little community and never
really got involved with the process.
But when
the District Board presented us with what they called a $4M “investment opportunity" in January of 2012 my curiosity got the best of me and I attended the Public Hearing to
find out what they had in store for us. My wife had attended one of the informational
meetings and told me I'd be shocked to hear the comments from the residents in attendance.
Prior to
going I did voluminous research, talked to a lot of people in the golf business
and came away convinced that what was proposed was not in
the best interests of the majority of Farmington Woods residents. On the night of the meeting I stepped up
to the lectern and voiced my disapproval as did many, many other residents, some more passionate and informed than me. It was so far from the norm it felt almost surreal to me.
Later in the meeting the Chair of the committee, Dirk Aube, took a question from a resident who was
concerned that she did not have enough information to vote on the issue and as
a result was going to have to vote "no" on the bonds. In his answer to her he addressed the entire
audience, telling us that he was impressed by their participation in the democratic process. He also made it very clear that “they” had enough
votes to win.
That
self-assured attitude rubbed me the wrong way and after the meeting my wife and
I approached Irene Loretto, then President of both boards. We asked her how the
board intended to disseminate the information we had just been given: that if
both bonds passed it would mean an 18% increase in District Taxes.
Her
response had the same self-assured tone. She told us that they had held two
informational hearings and now this Public Hearing on the matter and that they had done all they needed to do to
get the information out. Besides, she said "If residents were interested they could have
attended the meeting." End of story.
Since it
didn’t seem like enough of an effort to either of us, my wife asked her if it would be OK for us to get the information out. Her response was “Go right ahead”, as if she knew this sisyphean task could not be accomplished by two individual residents. How would you get the information out to 1,084
unit owners, let alone convince them to vote down a budget at Farmington Woods, something that had probably never happened before.
We took her
challenge and started on a mission which included the creation of Residents for Fiscal Responsibility, an eight member committee that paid for the mailing of
flyers to each unit owner not once but twice. These people, very concerned owners at Farmington Woods, saw no benefit to either proposal. My wife convinced me to create this
blog as a way to inform and educate residents and I spent the next two months
doing what I had never done before: I got involved with politics.
MY LAST GOOD DEED
I spent countless hours writing articles for just about every print media that gets delivered to Farmington Woods. I wrote articles for Avon Patch and several for CtWatchdog.com that got picked up by many
The results
of all this hard work were gratifying. With a record turnout of over 1,000
votes cast, the bonds were overwhelmingly rejected. This was not like most district
votes where 70 to 90 "yes" votes can pass a District budget. This was a
message from the great majority of residents. The people had spoken.
The next
week I attended the annual budget vote at the Clubhouse and since they contained
virtually no increase at all, both the District and Association budgets passed
with ease. There were actually 33 "no" votes to 77 "yes" votes, but I learned later that
compared to earlier years the no’s had increased dramatically.
Earlier this month on May 14th
my wife and I attended this years budget vote, again held at the clubhouse. As
I looked around the room I saw some familiar faces, but missing were a number
of faces that I would have expected to see. For all the struggles they went through
leading up to the actual budget vote I saw only two Mom’s and missing were some
of the people who had worked hard to defeat the budget last year. In the end
both budgets passed with ease.
After the
bond victory and the increased turnout last year I was surprised to see both budgets
pass so easily: the District budget 98-32 and the Association budget 179-46.
I found myself, as they say on the internet, SMH, (shaking my head) and asking how this
could happen. How could a budget with almost no increase garner more "no" votes than one that had nearly a five percent increase? And where were all the potential "no" voters?
Then I
recalled what I had seen during the voting process: individuals voting against
their own interests, many afraid to raise their “no” vote for fear of being
singled out by the glaring group in the front three rows, heads twisted to see who the traitors were. They were of course those 32 brave souls who stood by
their convictions and voted "no", which took courage considering the transparent manner in
which the vote was held.
As a result, even though the
bonds were voted down last year, the plan continues to replace the irrigation system,
renovate the clubhouse and add the clubhouse elevators that got voted down in last
year’s historic vote. The restaurant still needs it’s fix from residents in the
form of a monthly assessment and the golf club itself is still losing in excess
of a hundred grand again for the fifth
year in a row but you’d never no it by the voting results of that evening.
LET IT BE WHAT'S IT'S GOING TO BE
I left the meeting a little disgusted by the lack of progress in the past year. It seemed that the momentum built up last year had hit a wall and ground to a sudden halt. I felt like we failed.
I left the meeting a little disgusted by the lack of progress in the past year. It seemed that the momentum built up last year had hit a wall and ground to a sudden halt. I felt like we failed.
But then I
thought of all we accomplished in the last year: voting down $4M of indebtedness for a sport in decline worldwide and following that cleaning house both at the board and management levels. We actually did a lot more than we set out to do.
Put in terms of real world politics, we won the battle but lost the war. And in real world politics there are essentially two kinds of people (with some crossover in the middle): those who want change and those who resist it and will continue to resist
it until their dying breath.
The problem
is those who resist change know exactly how they want things to be: just as
they are now (or were in some golden era that exists only in their minds). The
people who want change? Their interests are usually so varied that it’s like
herding cats. It’s a nearly impossible task. Almost, Sisyphean.
In the end politics is a lot like
sports. The people who want it more usually win. In this case the group that
voted yes to the budget got what they wanted. Good for them. At least they showed up.
As for me,
I’m no Sisyphus. I can only take the rock rolling back on me so long before I decide to step aside and watch what happens when I let it go. After all, Sisyphus was serving a
sentence from the Gods. I'm not.
I’ll be here, but for now I’m back to following politics and not participating. Besides, I've got my own boulder to push.
*Title and subheadings inspired by Adam Carter, better known as A-Plus, from his CD "My Last Good Deed".